Skip to content

Comments

CompatHelper: bump compat for JLArrays in [extras] to 0.3, (keep existing compat)#339

Open
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
compathelper/new_version/2025-12-13-01-14-34-199-02495865875
Open

CompatHelper: bump compat for JLArrays in [extras] to 0.3, (keep existing compat)#339
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
compathelper/new_version/2025-12-13-01-14-34-199-02495865875

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request changes the compat entry for the JLArrays package from 0.2 to 0.2, 0.3.
This keeps the compat entries for earlier versions.

Note: I have not tested your package with this new compat entry.
It is your responsibility to make sure that your package tests pass before you merge this pull request.

@nsajko
Copy link
Member

nsajko commented Feb 20, 2026

merging this would presumably help with this precompilation warning:

WARNING: Constructor for type "BroadcastStyle" was extended in `JLArrays` without explicit qualification or import.
  NOTE: Assumed "BroadcastStyle" refers to `Broadcast.BroadcastStyle`. This behavior is deprecated and may differ in future versions.
  NOTE: This behavior may have differed in Julia versions prior to 1.12.
  Hint: If you intended to create a new generic function of the same name, use `function BroadcastStyle end`.
  Hint: To silence the warning, qualify `BroadcastStyle` as `Broadcast.BroadcastStyle` in the method signature or explicitly `import Broadcast: BroadcastStyle`.

  1 dependency had output during precompilation:
┌ JLArrays
│  [Output was shown above]
└

@aplavin
Copy link
Member

aplavin commented Feb 20, 2026

Any idea why CI didn't run here? Actions setup at https://github.com/JuliaArrays/StructArrays.jl/blob/master/.github/workflows/CI.yml looks fine, so maybe it is compathelper-related?

@nsajko
Copy link
Member

nsajko commented Feb 20, 2026

No idea. One option may be to switch to Dependabot.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants