Skip to content

feat: add gpt-5.3-codex-spark model to openai codex provider#11543

Draft
roomote[bot] wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
feature/add-gpt-5.3-codex-spark
Draft

feat: add gpt-5.3-codex-spark model to openai codex provider#11543
roomote[bot] wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
feature/add-gpt-5.3-codex-spark

Conversation

@roomote
Copy link
Contributor

@roomote roomote bot commented Feb 18, 2026

Adds the gpt-5.3-codex-spark model to the OpenAI Codex (ChatGPT) provider. This is a fast, lightweight coding model variant available via ChatGPT subscription.

Changes

  • Added gpt-5.3-codex-spark model definition to packages/types/src/providers/openai-codex.ts with appropriate capabilities (apply_patch tooling, prompt cache support, reasoning effort levels low/medium/high/xhigh, subscription-based zero pricing)
  • Updated test in src/api/providers/__tests__/openai-codex.spec.ts to cover the new model ID

Testing

  • All openai-codex provider tests pass (7/7)
  • All types package tests pass (149/149)
  • Full lint and type-check pass across all packages

View task on Roo Code Cloud

@roomote
Copy link
Contributor Author

roomote bot commented Feb 18, 2026

Rooviewer Clock   See task

No issues found. The rename from gpt-5.3-spark-codex to gpt-5.3-codex-spark is consistent with the naming convention of sibling codex models and correctly applied across both the model definition and the test.

Previous reviews

Mention @roomote in a comment to request specific changes to this pull request or fix all unresolved issues.

@roomote roomote bot changed the title feat: add gpt-5.3-codex-spark model to openai codex provider feat: add gpt-5.3-spark-codex model to openai codex provider Feb 18, 2026
@roomote roomote bot changed the title feat: add gpt-5.3-spark-codex model to openai codex provider feat: add gpt-5.3-codex-spark model to openai codex provider Feb 18, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

Comments