fix: Allow writing data with missing optional map fields#2797
Merged
Fokko merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom Dec 8, 2025
Merged
fix: Allow writing data with missing optional map fields#2797Fokko merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
Fokko merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
When writing data to a table with an optional map field, the schema compatibility check incorrectly failed if the data was missing that field. This happened because the validator descended into the map's internal key field (which is always required) even when the parent map field was optional and missing. The fix modifies _SchemaCompatibilityVisitor.field() to skip child validation when an optional parent field is missing from the provided schema. Closes apache#2684
76084a8 to
c7ba4b1
Compare
Fokko
approved these changes
Dec 8, 2025
Contributor
Fokko
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This makes sense to me, thanks for fixing this edge case 👍
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
_SchemaCompatibilityVisitor.field()to skip child validation when optional parent is missingRoot Cause
When writing data to a table with an optional map field, the schema compatibility check incorrectly failed if the data was missing that field. This happened because the validator descended into the map's internal key field (which is always
required=Trueper Iceberg spec) even when the parent map field was optional and missing.The Fix
Modified
_SchemaCompatibilityVisitor.field()inpyiceberg/schema.pyto check if the field exists in the provided schema before descending into children. If an optional parent field is missing, we skip child validation entirely.Test plan
make lint)