⚡️ Speed up function get_async_inline_code by 33% in PR #1518 (proper-async)#1519
⚡️ Speed up function get_async_inline_code by 33% in PR #1518 (proper-async)#1519codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 2 commits intoproper-asyncfrom
get_async_inline_code by 33% in PR #1518 (proper-async)#1519Conversation
The optimization achieves a **32% runtime improvement** by eliminating redundant work on every function call through two key changes: ## Primary Optimization: Module-Level Constants + Caching **What changed:** 1. **Module-level string constants**: The large inline code strings (1000+ characters each) are now defined once as module-level constants (`_BEHAVIOR_ASYNC_INLINE_CODE`, `_PERFORMANCE_ASYNC_INLINE_CODE`, `_CONCURRENCY_ASYNC_INLINE_CODE`) instead of being reconstructed as string literals on every function call. 2. **Cached dispatcher with dictionary lookup**: The `get_async_inline_code()` function is decorated with `@cache` and uses a pre-built dictionary (`_INLINE_CODE_MAP`) for O(1) mode lookups, replacing the sequential if-statement chain. **Why this is faster:** - **Eliminates string allocation overhead**: In the original code, Python had to allocate and construct the multi-line string literal every time a function was called. String literals in function bodies are not automatically interned, so each call created a new string object. The optimized version references the same string object stored at module initialization. - **Reduces CPU instruction count**: The original sequential if-checks required evaluating up to 2 enum comparisons per call. The optimized dictionary lookup is a single hash table access (~O(1)) that's even faster with `@cache` memoization—subsequent calls with the same `TestingMode` return the cached result immediately without any dictionary lookup. - **Caching multiplier effect**: The `@cache` decorator means the first call with each `TestingMode` performs the dictionary lookup once, then all subsequent calls with that mode are nearly instant pointer returns from the cache. **How this impacts real workloads:** Based on the `function_references`, `get_async_inline_code()` is called during test instrumentation in hot paths like `test_async_bubble_sort_behavior_results()`, `test_async_function_performance_mode()`, and `test_async_function_error_handling()`. These test setup functions likely run many times during development and CI/CD pipelines. The optimization means: - **Test instrumentation is faster**: Setting up async decorators for behavior/performance testing completes 32% faster, reducing overall test suite setup time. - **Scales with test volume**: The annotated tests show improvements compound in loops—`test_mass_compilation_of_generated_codes_varied_modes` runs 38.6% faster (329μs → 237μs) when calling the function 1000 times. - **Best for repeated mode access**: Tests that call the same mode multiple times benefit most from caching (e.g., `test_get_async_inline_code_called_multiple_times_performance` shows 44.1% speedup for 100 calls). The optimization trades a negligible increase in module initialization time and memory (storing three strings at module level) for substantial per-call speedup, making it particularly effective for test instrumentation workflows that repeatedly access the same testing mode configurations.
| return get_concurrency_async_inline_code() | ||
| return get_performance_async_inline_code() | ||
| # Return the inline code for the requested mode. Default to performance mode if not matched. | ||
| return _INLINE_CODE_MAP.get(mode, _PERFORMANCE_ASYNC_INLINE_CODE) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Minor: Dead code / string duplication
The get_async_inline_code function now uses _INLINE_CODE_MAP (module-level constants), but the three original functions (get_behavior_async_inline_code, get_performance_async_inline_code, get_concurrency_async_inline_code) still exist and return identical strings. This means each inline code string is stored twice in memory.
Consider either:
- Removing the old functions and keeping only the module-level constants, or
- Having the old functions reference the constants (e.g.,
return _BEHAVIOR_ASYNC_INLINE_CODE)
Not a bug — just unnecessary duplication.
PR Review SummaryPrek Checks
Mypy
Code ReviewNo critical bugs, security vulnerabilities, or breaking API changes found. This PR optimizes
The string constants were verified to be byte-identical to the original function return values. Minor observation (inline comment posted): The three original Test Coverage
Optimization PRs (codeflash-ai[bot])Checked CI status for all 29 open codeflash optimization PRs. No PRs were merged — all have at least some failing checks. The closest candidates (PRs #1344, #1346, #1350, #1359) pass all substantive CI checks but fail on Last updated: 2026-02-18T07:15Z |
⚡️ This pull request contains optimizations for PR #1518
If you approve this dependent PR, these changes will be merged into the original PR branch
proper-async.📄 33% (0.33x) speedup for
get_async_inline_codeincodeflash/code_utils/instrument_existing_tests.py⏱️ Runtime :
515 microseconds→388 microseconds(best of152runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimization achieves a 32% runtime improvement by eliminating redundant work on every function call through two key changes:
Primary Optimization: Module-Level Constants + Caching
What changed:
Module-level string constants: The large inline code strings (1000+ characters each) are now defined once as module-level constants (
_BEHAVIOR_ASYNC_INLINE_CODE,_PERFORMANCE_ASYNC_INLINE_CODE,_CONCURRENCY_ASYNC_INLINE_CODE) instead of being reconstructed as string literals on every function call.Cached dispatcher with dictionary lookup: The
get_async_inline_code()function is decorated with@cacheand uses a pre-built dictionary (_INLINE_CODE_MAP) for O(1) mode lookups, replacing the sequential if-statement chain.Why this is faster:
Eliminates string allocation overhead: In the original code, Python had to allocate and construct the multi-line string literal every time a function was called. String literals in function bodies are not automatically interned, so each call created a new string object. The optimized version references the same string object stored at module initialization.
Reduces CPU instruction count: The original sequential if-checks required evaluating up to 2 enum comparisons per call. The optimized dictionary lookup is a single hash table access (~O(1)) that's even faster with
@cachememoization—subsequent calls with the sameTestingModereturn the cached result immediately without any dictionary lookup.Caching multiplier effect: The
@cachedecorator means the first call with eachTestingModeperforms the dictionary lookup once, then all subsequent calls with that mode are nearly instant pointer returns from the cache.How this impacts real workloads:
Based on the
function_references,get_async_inline_code()is called during test instrumentation in hot paths liketest_async_bubble_sort_behavior_results(),test_async_function_performance_mode(), andtest_async_function_error_handling(). These test setup functions likely run many times during development and CI/CD pipelines. The optimization means:test_mass_compilation_of_generated_codes_varied_modesruns 38.6% faster (329μs → 237μs) when calling the function 1000 times.test_get_async_inline_code_called_multiple_times_performanceshows 44.1% speedup for 100 calls).The optimization trades a negligible increase in module initialization time and memory (storing three strings at module level) for substantial per-call speedup, making it particularly effective for test instrumentation workflows that repeatedly access the same testing mode configurations.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Click to see Generated Regression Tests
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-pr1518-2026-02-18T06.52.51and push.