Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade qs from 6.14.1 to 6.14.2#196

Open
shafeeqd959 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
snyk-fix-60ef39aa371383ac77ab400c77917a83
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade qs from 6.14.1 to 6.14.2#196
shafeeqd959 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
snyk-fix-60ef39aa371383ac77ab400c77917a83

Conversation

@shafeeqd959
Copy link

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • package.json
  • package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
SNYK-JS-QS-15268416
  82  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

@shafeeqd959 shafeeqd959 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 14, 2026 08:21
@github-actions
Copy link

Coverage report

St.
Category Percentage Covered / Total
🟢 Statements 99.13% 229/231
🟢 Branches 96.95% 127/131
🟢 Functions 100% 34/34
🟢 Lines 99.07% 213/215

Test suite run success

135 tests passing in 7 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 0cfc915

@github-actions
Copy link

Coverage report

St.
Category Percentage Covered / Total
🟢 Statements 99.13% 229/231
🟢 Branches 96.95% 127/131
🟢 Functions 100% 34/34
🟢 Lines 99.07% 213/215

Test suite run success

135 tests passing in 7 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 0cfc915

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants