Make the tests pass with Docutils 0.22#207
Merged
bsipocz merged 2 commits intoexecutablebooks:masterfrom Jan 17, 2026
Merged
Conversation
mitya57
changed the title
gentoo-bot
pushed a commit
to gentoo/gentoo
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 4, 2025
Pull-Request: executablebooks/sphinx-tabs#207 Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Lucas-dominguez
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2025
mr-c
added a commit
to mr-c/cheroot
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2026
There is a pending fix upstream at executablebooks/sphinx-tabs#207
|
Is there any way to help with this ? |
bsipocz
force-pushed
the
docutils-0.22
branch
from
c87f86c to
6197138
Compare
That attribute is no longer present since this Docutils commit: https://sourceforge.net/p/docutils/code/9684/ Fixes executablebooks#206.
bsipocz
force-pushed
the
docutils-0.22
branch
from
6197138 to
434eab2
Compare
bsipocz
approved these changes
Jan 17, 2026
|
For anyone also getting lost in the version matrix: this fix has not been released yet, it just missed https://github.com/executablebooks/sphinx-tabs/commits/v3.4.7/ Should be in the next one. |
Member
|
Yes, there are still sphinx9/py314 issues that should ideally be sorted out before a release. Last time I checked: #209 (comment) |
mr-c
added a commit
to mr-c/cheroot
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2026
There is a pending fix upstream at executablebooks/sphinx-tabs#207
mr-c
added a commit
to mr-c/cheroot
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2026
There is a pending fix upstream at executablebooks/sphinx-tabs#207
mr-c
added a commit
to mr-c/cheroot
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2026
There is a pending fix upstream at executablebooks/sphinx-tabs#207
mr-c
added a commit
to mr-c/cheroot
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2026
There is a pending fix upstream at executablebooks/sphinx-tabs#207
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
backrefsattribute always exists. It is no longer present since this Docutils commit: https://sourceforge.net/p/docutils/code/9684/.str(int(value)), see https://sourceforge.net/p/docutils/code/9691/.The CI fails because the tests are also broken by new Sphinx, PR #200 should help with that.
Fixes #206.