Skip to content

Conversation

@bandrade
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@kuiwang02
Copy link
Contributor

/payload-aggregate periodic-ci-openshift-operator-framework-operator-controller-release-4.22-periodics-e2e-gcp-ovn-fips-extended-f2 3

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 14, 2026

@kuiwang02: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-operator-framework-operator-controller-release-4.22-periodics-e2e-gcp-ovn-fips-extended-f2

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/669f1200-f0f5-11f0-84d2-4d2ce215d1fe-0

@kuiwang02
Copy link
Contributor

@bandrade
Copy link
Contributor Author

/payload-aggregate periodic-ci-openshift-operator-framework-operator-controller-release-4.22-periodics-e2e-gcp-ovn-fips-extended-f2 3

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 21, 2026

@bandrade: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-operator-framework-operator-controller-release-4.22-periodics-e2e-gcp-ovn-fips-extended-f2

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/17867860-f65f-11f0-8b10-0be95671d133-0

@kuiwang02
Copy link
Contributor

kuiwang02 commented Jan 21, 2026

the case 85889 is failing. you could refer to https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/17867860-f65f-11f0-8b10-0be95671d133-0

suggest you to run it locally before submitting the PR.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 27, 2026
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 27, 2026
@bandrade
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retitle NO-ISSUE: add 85889 automation

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title UPSTREAM: <carry>: add 85889 automation NO-ISSUE: add 85889 automation Jan 27, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jan 27, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bandrade: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@kuiwang02
Copy link
Contributor

/payload-aggregate periodic-ci-openshift-operator-framework-operator-controller-release-4.22-periodics-e2e-gcp-ovn-fips-extended-f2 3

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 28, 2026

@kuiwang02: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-operator-framework-operator-controller-release-4.22-periodics-e2e-gcp-ovn-fips-extended-f2

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/3087dc80-fbe8-11f0-9338-8b322bf2a9c1-0

@kuiwang02
Copy link
Contributor

/payload-aggregate periodic-ci-openshift-operator-framework-operator-controller-release-4.22-periodics-e2e-gcp-ovn-fips-extended-f2 3

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 28, 2026

@kuiwang02: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-operator-framework-operator-controller-release-4.22-periodics-e2e-gcp-ovn-fips-extended-f2

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/6a7bd150-fc09-11f0-96c1-f7236a691700-0

@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Member

Hi @bandrade any updates?

@bandrade
Copy link
Contributor Author

bandrade commented Feb 3, 2026

/hold
Currently testing locally

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 3, 2026
@bandrade
Copy link
Contributor Author

bandrade commented Feb 4, 2026

/payload-aggregate periodic-ci-openshift-operator-framework-operator-controller-release-4.22-periodics-e2e-gcp-ovn-fips-extended-f2 3

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 4, 2026

@bandrade: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-operator-framework-operator-controller-release-4.22-periodics-e2e-gcp-ovn-fips-extended-f2

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/123f3cb0-017d-11f1-90f1-baafe12c9226-0

@bandrade
Copy link
Contributor Author

bandrade commented Feb 4, 2026

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 4, 2026
@kuiwang02
Copy link
Contributor

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-operator-framework-operator-controller-release-4.22-periodics-e2e-gcp-ovn-fips-extended-f2

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 4, 2026

@kuiwang02: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-operator-framework-operator-controller-release-4.22-periodics-e2e-gcp-ovn-fips-extended-f2

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/04dfac20-018d-11f1-9895-4eead1382506-0

@kuiwang02
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/verified by @bandrade

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Feb 4, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@kuiwang02: This PR has been marked as verified by @bandrade.

Details

In response to this:

/lgtm
/verified by @bandrade

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 4, 2026
@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Member

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 4, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bandrade, jianzhangbjz

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 4, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 4, 2026

@bandrade: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/openshift-e2e-aws 7e83268 link unknown /test openshift-e2e-aws

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 681af66 and 2 for PR HEAD 7e83268 in total

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants