claude-drafted uncoached solution for 1022#2436
claude-drafted uncoached solution for 1022#2436grokspawn wants to merge 1 commit intooperator-framework:mainfrom
Conversation
Signed-off-by: grokspawn <jordan@nimblewidget.com>
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
✅ Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR improves error messaging for resolution failures when upgrade constraints prevent finding a valid successor bundle. The implementation adds a new field to track whether upgrade policy enforcement is active and provides a more specific error message in this scenario.
- Adds
UpgradePolicyEnforcedfield toresolutionErrorstruct to track when upgrade constraints are being applied - Implements specialized error message logic that clearly indicates when a desired version range doesn't match any valid successor
- Updates test expectation to reflect the new, more descriptive error message format
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| internal/operator-controller/resolve/catalog.go | Adds UpgradePolicyEnforced field to resolutionError and implements new error message path for upgrade constraint violations |
| internal/operator-controller/resolve/catalog_test.go | Updates test expectation to match new error message format for upgrade constraint failure scenario |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| Channels []string | ||
| InstalledBundle *ocv1.BundleMetadata | ||
| ResolvedBundles []foundBundle | ||
| UpgradePolicyEnforced bool |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The new field UpgradePolicyEnforced introduces additional state tracking into the error structure. While this field is correctly computed based on the upgrade policy and presence of an installed bundle, this represents adding a new dimension to track state that could alternatively be derived from existing fields (InstalledBundle != nil and comparing against the policy enum). Consider whether this field is necessary or if the error message generation logic could make the same determination from the existing fields to avoid redundant state tracking.
Description
claude's uncoached solution for 1022. While this represents a compliant solution and possibly a minimalist one, it nonetheless establishes a new dimension instead of refactoring the existing mechanism to include the scenario.
Reviewer Checklist