Feature - Added API Deprecations Resource#282
Merged
tareqtms merged 2 commits intophpclassic:masterfrom Dec 14, 2022
Merged
Conversation
c9fc2ea to
958c35c
Compare
tareqtms
approved these changes
Dec 14, 2022
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I have added a new Shopify API Resource to retrieve the Shopify API Deprecations that Shopify has logged in their system. This is helpful for developers to stay up to date with deprecations that are coming up in the future. The resource returns an array of API deprecations example:
Usage
$shopify->ApiDeprecations()->get()More Information
https://shopify.dev/api/admin-rest/2022-04/resources/deprecated-api-calls#get-deprecated-api-calls
Thank you for the consideration of this PR, my team and myself would find this as a helpful inclusion to the library.
PS - I also have submitted a PR for Callbacks after Curl requests, would it be possible to include this in the library as well? #276