Skip to content

Add a Sphinx extension to document cached properties of slots classes#1519

Open
clayote wants to merge 35 commits intopython-attrs:mainfrom
clayote:sphinx-attr-getter-ext
Open

Add a Sphinx extension to document cached properties of slots classes#1519
clayote wants to merge 35 commits intopython-attrs:mainfrom
clayote:sphinx-attr-getter-ext

Conversation

@clayote
Copy link

@clayote clayote commented Feb 21, 2026

Summary

This is a small extension for Sphinx, the documentation generator that attrs uses. Where cached properties on slots classes were missing previously (#1325), this extension restores them.

I added a dictionary to slotted class objects, __attrs_cached_properties__, where they keep the cached property objects for Sphinx.

I wrapped the __slots__ tuple itself in a custom collections.abc.Sequence that acts exactly like its tuple, but isn't considered one for the purposes of isinstance(), because, currently, I have to do that in order to make Sphinx use the extension on slots. I have a PR for Sphinx open to make that unnecessary.

To use the extension, add "attrs.sphinx_cached_property" to extensions in your Sphinx conf.py.

Pull Request Check List

  • Do not open pull requests from your main branch – use a separate branch!
    • There's a ton of footguns waiting if you don't heed this warning. You can still go back to your project, create a branch from your main branch, push it, and open the pull request from the new branch.
    • This is not a pre-requisite for your pull request to be accepted, but you have been warned.
  • Added tests for changed code.
    Our CI fails if coverage is not 100%.
  • Changes or additions to public APIs are reflected in our type stubs (files ending in .pyi).
    • ...and used in the stub test file typing-examples/baseline.py or, if necessary, typing-examples/mypy.py.
    • If they've been added to attr/__init__.pyi, they've also been re-imported in attrs/__init__.pyi.
  • Updated documentation for changed code.
    • New functions/classes have to be added to docs/api.rst by hand.
    • Changes to the signatures of @attr.s() and @attrs.define() have to be added by hand too.
    • Changed/added classes/methods/functions have appropriate versionadded, versionchanged, or deprecated directives.
      The next version is the second number in the current release + 1.
      The first number represents the current year.
      So if the current version on PyPI is 22.2.0, the next version is gonna be 22.3.0.
      If the next version is the first in the new year, it'll be 23.1.0.
      • If something changed that affects both attrs.define() and attr.s(), you have to add version directives to both.
  • Documentation in .rst and .md files is written using semantic newlines.
  • Changes (and possible deprecations) have news fragments in changelog.d.
  • Consider granting push permissions to the PR branch, so maintainers can fix minor issues themselves without pestering you.

@clayote clayote force-pushed the sphinx-attr-getter-ext branch 2 times, most recently from 6fce05b to 365bc5c Compare February 21, 2026 18:27
@clayote
Copy link
Author

clayote commented Feb 21, 2026

I wrote a test for this, but it won't run in CI currently, because that test requires Sphinx to be installed. That's why the pre-commit check is failing.

@clayote clayote marked this pull request as ready for review February 21, 2026 18:51
@clayote clayote force-pushed the sphinx-attr-getter-ext branch 4 times, most recently from 1daa5c1 to b21e641 Compare February 22, 2026 03:04
@clayote clayote marked this pull request as draft February 22, 2026 04:43
@clayote
Copy link
Author

clayote commented Feb 22, 2026

I need to make sure the :members: directive works, too...

@clayote
Copy link
Author

clayote commented Feb 22, 2026

I haven't a clue what's going on with those interrogate failures! It seems to be related to coverage somehow? @hynek ?

@clayote clayote marked this pull request as ready for review February 22, 2026 08:30
@hynek
Copy link
Member

hynek commented Feb 22, 2026

I haven't a clue what's going on with those interrogate failures! It seems to be related to coverage somehow? @hynek ?

on a quick look I see two tests without docstrings

@clayote
Copy link
Author

clayote commented Feb 22, 2026

Checks are passing, I think it's ready @hynek

@clayote clayote force-pushed the sphinx-attr-getter-ext branch from c824181 to 672bfb7 Compare February 22, 2026 22:04
@clayote
Copy link
Author

clayote commented Feb 22, 2026

@sscherfke
Copy link
Contributor

sscherfke commented Feb 22, 2026

@clayote Your actions create a lot of noise and many notifications. It would be helpful if you did more work offline and and only post updates and questions when really needed. This would make it easier for reviewers/maintainers to help you.

@clayote clayote force-pushed the sphinx-attr-getter-ext branch from 5858047 to a31031b Compare February 23, 2026 13:44
@AdrianSosic
Copy link

@clayote: feel free to ping me when it's ready for me to test 👌🏼

@clayote
Copy link
Author

clayote commented Feb 24, 2026

@AdrianSosic Please do

@clayote
Copy link
Author

clayote commented Feb 24, 2026

Huh, I guess I'd better write documentation for the extension.

It's not part of the API, really? Where should it go...

@clayote clayote requested a review from webknjaz February 25, 2026 18:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants