GHSA SYNC: 1 brand new unreviewed advisories #969
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| engine: ruby | ||
| cve: 2011-3624 | ||
| ghsa: rc82-v3mm-rhj2 | ||
| url: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-3624 | ||
| title: Various methods in WEBrick::HTTPRequest in Ruby 1.9.2 and 1.8.7 | ||
| date: 2019-11-25 | ||
| description: | | ||
| Various methods in WEBrick::HTTPRequest in Ruby | ||
| 1.9.2-p290 and 1.8.7-p352 and earlier do not validate the | ||
| X-Forwarded-For, X-Forwarded-Host and X-Forwarded-Server headers in | ||
| requests, which might allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary text | ||
| into log files or bypass intended address parsing via a crafted header. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Can only have one "notes:" field for adding these notes here: | ||
| - https://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5418 mentioned CVE-2011-3187 | ||
| - https://webservsec.blogspot.com/2011/02/ruby-on-rails-vulnerability.html | ||
| - https://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5418 says: | ||
| - "WEBrick has been removed from ruby repository. If anyone interest | ||
| this, Please file this to https://github.com/ruby/webrick" | ||
| - Unclear when or if this was patched. | ||
| cvss_v2: 5.0 | ||
| cvss_v3: 5.3 | ||
| notes: Never patched | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Is this is still unpatched? Also, WEBrick was moved out of Ruby and into a separate gem as of Ruby 3.0.0. I feel like |
||
| related: | ||
| url: | ||
| - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-3624 | ||
| - https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2011-3624 | ||
| - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2011-3624 | ||
| - https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-3624 | ||
| - https://github.com/ruby/webrick | ||
| - https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-rc82-v3mm-rhj2 | ||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| engine: ruby | ||
| cve: 2016-2336 | ||
| ghsa: f46g-7w88-2qv4 | ||
| url: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-2336 | ||
| title: Type confusion exists in ole_invoke and ole_query_interface | ||
| methods of Ruby's WIN32OLE class | ||
| date: 2017-01-06 | ||
| description: | | ||
| Type confusion exists in two methods of Ruby's WIN32OLE class, | ||
| ole_invoke and ole_query_interface. | ||
| Attacker passing different type of object than this assumed by | ||
| developers can cause arbitrary code execution. | ||
| cvss_v2: 7.5 | ||
| cvss_v3: 9.8 | ||
| notes: "Never patched" | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Is it really fair to flag all Ruby versions because of a stdlib gem that is not required by default and can only be used on a Windows system? Perhaps this should go into |
||
| related: | ||
| url: | ||
| - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-2336 | ||
| - http://www.talosintelligence.com/reports/TALOS-2016-0029 | ||
| - https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-f46g-7w88-2qv4 | ||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
notes:is free form text. This additional information should be put intonotes:. The additional URLs can also be added to the related urls list.