Skip to content

Conversation

@pfarnach
Copy link
Contributor

@pfarnach pfarnach commented Jan 30, 2026

This PR implements the requested change from this stalled PR #884

And fixes #817

Copy link
Member

@travi travi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks for restarting the effort and conversation around this one, @pfarnach. i think this does get us most of the way there, but we'll need to find a more dynamic approach that considers cases where the stable release branch is not named main

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
export default function isLatestRelease({ type, main }) {
return type === "release" && main ? "true" : "false";
Copy link
Member

@travi travi Jan 30, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it wouldnt be safe to specifically target the main branch since master is still common and there are other patterns that teams use for naming their stable release branch. this would need to consider how the release branches are defined for the specific project

Copy link
Contributor Author

@pfarnach pfarnach Jan 30, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @travi thanks for looking at my PR!

I'm having trouble finding explicit docs about the branch object (the closest thing I could find is here) so I'm going off my very cursory understanding of the source code. It seems like main in this context is a boolean (rather than a string representing the branch name) that's set here, based on the index of the branch that's passed into the config. In any case, that also doesn't seem very reliable unless there's something ensuring the main/master/whatever branch is the first element there.

Would it be enough to just check the type value and remove the main check? From what I can tell, the other possible values are maintenance and prerelease but could use a gut-check on that.

Copy link
Member

@travi travi Feb 6, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think you did find the closest thing to documentation on that detail. with the lack of a better doc, i went spelunking through what the core package passes to this lifecycle method to refresh my understanding. looks like i landed in the same places you explored. some of this is from before i joined the project and doesnt always stick in my brain properly. i think you landed on the correct approach.

Would it be enough to just check the type value and remove the main check? From what I can tell, the other possible values are maintenance and prerelease but could use a gut-check on that.

main accounts for "next"-type releases. not a prerelease, not a maintenance release. normal release, but not to the default channel. so given that, main is needed for determining "latest" and you've handled it appropriately here.

sorry for my confusion before and thanks for your patience

Copy link
Member

@travi travi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thank you for your help getting this resolved!

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
export default function isLatestRelease({ type, main }) {
return type === "release" && main ? "true" : "false";
Copy link
Member

@travi travi Feb 6, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think you did find the closest thing to documentation on that detail. with the lack of a better doc, i went spelunking through what the core package passes to this lifecycle method to refresh my understanding. looks like i landed in the same places you explored. some of this is from before i joined the project and doesnt always stick in my brain properly. i think you landed on the correct approach.

Would it be enough to just check the type value and remove the main check? From what I can tell, the other possible values are maintenance and prerelease but could use a gut-check on that.

main accounts for "next"-type releases. not a prerelease, not a maintenance release. normal release, but not to the default channel. so given that, main is needed for determining "latest" and you've handled it appropriately here.

sorry for my confusion before and thanks for your patience

@travi
Copy link
Member

travi commented Feb 6, 2026

it looks like we have some failures in the integration tests. could you look into those? likely some small updates are needed based on these changes. also, it might be worth having an integration test or two for this scenario, so while youre fixing these up, please read through the existing tests to decide if that could be valuable.

@pfarnach
Copy link
Contributor Author

pfarnach commented Feb 7, 2026

Appreciate the review, @travi -- I fixed the integration tests and added three more to cover the publishing-without-assets flow

@travi travi merged commit 38051ba into semantic-release:master Feb 7, 2026
6 checks passed
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2026

🎉 This PR is included in version 12.0.5 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@pfarnach pfarnach deleted the make-latest-support branch February 7, 2026 05:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add an option to not mark maintenance releases as latest

2 participants